Last updated 25 June 2026.
Workplace Spend Experts publishes practical, buyer side guidance on cutting digital workplace and SaaS overspend. This page explains who writes that content, how it is researched and reviewed, how we keep it current, and how to tell us if something is wrong. Our aim is simple: advice you can act on, with no vendor agenda behind it.
Who writes our content
Every article, guide, comparison and case study is produced by our principal advisors, Fredrik Filipsson and Morten Andersen, who between them have spent decades inside enterprise software licensing, renewals and the digital workplace stack. Bylines link to the author's profile so you can see who stands behind each piece and judge their relevant experience for yourself.
Independence and conflicts of interest
We are an independent, buyer side firm. We are not a vendor or reseller, we hold no partner status that pays us to move volume, and we take no vendor commission. We are paid only by the buyer we advise. That independence shapes what we recommend: where the evidence supports cutting a tool, downgrading a tier, or walking away from a renewal, we say so. Where we mention a specific vendor or product, it is to describe the tools we help clients optimize, never because we are paid to promote it.
How we research and source
Our guidance is anchored in the patterns we see repeatedly on engagements and in primary vendor terms. Where we cite vendor pricing, plan mechanics or licensing rules, we work from the vendor's own published terms and we date the reference, because SaaS pricing changes often. Any figure that depends on plan mix, usage or contract terms is presented as representative rather than a guarantee, and carries an "as of" date where it matters.
Accuracy and review
Content is reviewed for accuracy before it is published and is checked against current vendor terms when those terms change. Case studies on this site are anonymised composites, built from real engagement patterns rather than a single named account, and we label them as such so you are never misled about their nature.
Keeping content current
Every article shows a clear "last updated" date. We revisit pages when vendor pricing, plan structures or licensing rules change materially, prioritising the topics with the most buyer impact such as Microsoft 365 and collaboration spend. An older date means the guidance has not needed revision, not that it has been forgotten.
Corrections
If you spot an error, an out of date figure, or anything that reads as misleading, tell us and we will fix it. The fastest route is our contact page. We treat corrections seriously, because the value of buyer side guidance depends entirely on it being right.
Not legal advice
Everything we publish is commercial and cost advisory. It is not legal advice and does not replace it. For the interpretation of any contract, license term or renewal clause, use your own legal counsel. See our privacy and terms page for how we handle your information.